For the overwhelming number of excessively long comments that I have linguistically adventurously grammatically enticingly spawn, anyone can call on me for my Cliff's Notes (1) version.
Note however that the lowest number of words to which I can count is zero. That situation may result in a version that has no words.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, credit: DJT. Hint: President on this day.
E.G., this comment's Cliff's Notes version is, Intellectual Nonsense, (except the part, "Thank you for your attention to this matter", credit; DJT.)
(1) Cliff's Notes: Application of the educational institution contestants' theory of effective deception, I.E. mis/dis-information.
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Sept 2025]
Gab: Sept 6, 2025.
GETTR: Sept 6, 2025.
Locals: Sept 6, 2025.
Truth Social: Sept 6, 2025.
X: Sept 6, 2025.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
