Personally, my suspicion is that when historians are matching up events that are repetitious in nature in the general realm of reality not necessarily identical in circumstances the phrase "let them eat cake" (1) will be analogized to the phrase "who cares" (2).
(1) Marie Antoinette, paraphrased?
(2) Mark Carney, quoted exactly but does not include the inspirational question. Research will resolve an upset stomach possessed by the curious.
Footnote: OPINION, matters. Everyone's. Perhaps especially HRC.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Dec 2025]
Gab: Dec 10, 2025.
GETTR: Dec 10, 2025.
Locals: Dec 10, 2025.
Truth Social: Dec 10, 2025.
X: Dec 10, 2025.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
