Premise 1: all decisions / actions of government both affect and effect citizens.
Premise 2: more likely people employed by government can tell you the people that their decisions help.
Premise 3: all laws, rules, regulations hurt people.
Premise 4: more likely people employed by government cannot, will not or do not want to tell you the people that their decisions have hurt.
Question: For all politicians and government employees to ask themselves before working in government is how many people have you or will you hurt as a result of your decisions and/or actions?
Run with it as your conscience leads you, Toward or away or both?
Note: This issue does not and is not directed to people in government who are tasked with security (physical) situations. Exceptions probably exist. Human nature.
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 11, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 11, 2025.
Locals: Aug 11, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 11, 2025.
X: Aug 11, 2025.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
