Casting out into the deepness of the mental conversion of thoughts into written expression, the hook drops into the shallow end of logic, reason and bias to fish for the answer of whether all of us have to become propagators of *"Cliff Notes" (figuratively).
*Cliff Notes, an educational tool designed to take a test with minimal preparatory mental exercise. Don't believe me? Look it up dummy.
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 3, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 3, 2025.
Locals: Aug 3, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 3, 2025.
X: Aug 3, 2025.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
