I believe if the issue of reeducation is examined in detail the circumstances will disclose that many agree that reeducation may be appropriate. A specific applicable example of such a situation is an addict learning how to wean themselves off the addiction. The person will not learn until they want to learn. It likely will be futile to attempt to make them learn coercively. Recommended treatment is to apply this reasoning plentifully. This methodology may prevent repetition or increased addiction(s), perhaps even addictions of/by/to/from (y)our own.
Note: Addictions to power and/or money may require more legal expertise to determine the best treatment, should a seeker be encountered.
Added to Gab. April 2, 2025.
Added to GETTR. April 2, 2025.
Added to Locals. April 2, 2025.
Added to Truth Social. April 2, 2025.
Added to X. April 2, 2025.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
