Uninquiring minds may want to know if a person accuses someone of spreading misinformation that is not misinformation is the person making the accusation spreading misinformation? Your response is as good as my response unless your answer is wrong in which case it becomes mis-answer-mation.
If you conclude this is nonsense, bingo. You win.
Final comment: this mental/speech gymnastics is a game seems to be most frequently played by the educated self-identifying intellectually impaired. Which makes me one of them. Your conclusions may vary (please?).
Added to Gab. January 30, 2025.
Added to GETTR. January 30, 2025.
Added to Locals. January 30, 2025.
Added to Truth Social. January 30, 2025.
Added to X. January 30, 2025.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
