There is a common off-hand comment that goes as follows: trust me, I know what I am talking about (or doing). My advice regarding myself can be easily remembered by reversing the requests: Don't trust me. I don't know what I am talking about, I do know I have opinions without guarantees. Believe them at your risk not mine.
Note: I try to apply this rationale to everyone/thing I input into my thought processor. Most of the time it works. Too many times it doesn't. Of course, vanity, a euphemism for bias, may affect the actual count of the number of times it fails to work accurately.
Added to Gab. September 11, 2024.
Added to Locals. September 11, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. September 11, 2024.
Added to Gettr. September 11, 2024.
Added to X. September 11, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
