The simplest technique I have devised for my personal use to determine who most likely knows that there was cheating in the elections of 2020 is to include anyone (almost all) who say there was not cheating in the elections.
Note: This does not take into account a person's mental stability therefore that person's perception of reality. Including my own.
Added to Gab. August 27, 2024
Added to Locals. Aug 27, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. Aug 27, 2024.
Added to Gettr. Aug 27, 2024.
Added to X. Aug 27, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
