If the word marijuana is changed by consensus to gay tobacco (1), how high could you imagine that would fly? Or, perhaps it would fall flat on its face in a deep sleep. Fairy tales begin here and now.
(1) Credit to the insightfulness of those who have paved the annals of history with the phrase gay marriage.
- To meet the standards for crassness, a reader is permitted to drop one "n" from the word annals.
- If using your imagination is necessary, you are closer to God than probably many others.
Oh, by the way the original question is would changing the word reduce usage of gay tobacco?
Let me know after you try it. Or not.
Added to Gab. July 21, 2024.
Added to Locals. July 21, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. July 21, 2024.
Added to Gettr. July 21, 2024.
Added to X. July 21, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
