Almost everything breaking as "news" about FJB seems to qualify as a joke in a clickbait presentation.
For example, (1) "OOF! Former Obama Adviser David Axelrod Calls Biden’s ABC Interview ‘Sad’ and Says He is ‘Dangerously Out of Touch’ (with VIDEO)". So you decide is the author stating that Axelrod is "dangerously out of touch" or, is the author writing about FJB? And either way does it make a difference? Maybe it covers both FJB and Axelrod. And the creme de la creme interrogatory. Anyone have the wisdom to suggest what they are out of touch with?
(1) https : // www . thegatewaypundit . com / 2024/07/oof-former-obama-adviser-david-axelrod-calls-bidens/
Added to Gab. July 6, 2024.
Added to Gettr. July 6, 2024.
Added to Locals. July 6, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. July 6, 2024.
Added to X. July 6, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
