Eliminating criminals is more likely than eliminating supporters of criminals, aka persons who abet (help) criminals.
Perhaps this comment is a redundant ambiguous oxymoron. Criminals will not eliminate themselves and people who support criminals are themselves criminals for supporting the criminals and like the criminal referred to in the beginning of this sentence, it is unlikely they will eliminate themselves.
Jekyll and Hyde personality? (1)
(1) The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, novella by Scottish writer Robert Louis Stevenson, published in 1886.
Added to Gab. May 8, 2024.
Added to Gettr. May 8, 2024.
Added to Locals. May 8, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. May 8, 2024
Added to X. May 8, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
