If any person or organization seeks funds from others to use to (abet) facilitate sustainability of fraudsters (people or organizations that broke the law), are they not breaking the law?
Examples: Government, NGO's, charity organizations (alleged), and the plethora of organizational weeds growing around the moniker IRS 503 c_.
This question has an adjacent cousin question that has been used in the past to establlish the answer, which is, is the getaway driver for bank robbers a law breaker?
That question is a non rhetorical addendum: You do know what the answer is don't you?
Added to Gab. May 7, 2024.
Added to Gettr. May 7, 2024.
Added to Locals. May 7, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. May 7, 2024
Added to X. May 7, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
