Some who ignore their predecessors act as though their legacy will be something different than what they accomplish or do not accomplish. If the sole accomplishment is ignoring those who came before them, they themselves will probably be ignored by those who come after them because ignore-ance is bliss with nothing remaining to find of those predecessors who were ignored thus nothing to look at (accomplished) by those who ignored them.
Might one think that they are burning bridges before them.
Added to Gab. April 4, 2024.
Added to Gettr. April 4, 2024.
Added to Locals. April 4, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. April 4, 2024
Added to X. April 4, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
