The most effective prosecutor is time. For example, at the beginning of the MeToo (1) claim the intuition of the part of society not involved in these claims of criminal promiscuity and abuse suspected the story was short in logic. As time continues on, the morals and legal propensities of the people involved in this behavior suggests that the title, MeToo would be appropriately descriptive from the start had it been titled AllOfUsToo. And instead of a title grouping victims, it was grouping those who legally and morally were aware of the situation and allowed it to continue (the perpetrators/facilitators). Some of whom were effectively beneficiaries of their own benefaction, or so they seem to think.
(1) MeToo awareness. Approximate starting point is 2006. For additional details do your research.
Added to Gab. April 1, 2024.
Added to Gettr. April 1, 2024.
Added to Locals. April 1, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. April 1, 2024.
Added to X. April 1, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
