Relative cannot be the foundation of a factual analysis. Absolute is that foundation. If the conclusion is not absolute the issue remains theoretical or hypothetical. Almost every statistical analysis and conclusion derived therefrom (statistical analysis) is guess work.
So, what is the moral of this comment? Don't believe it until it is done.
Stated differently: trust but verify. (1)
(1) My opinion is that this statement has a Russian proverb origin. Ronald Reagan said the remark a few times during the INF treaty talks between the United States and Russia represented by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev.
Added to Gab. March 28, 2024.
Added to Gettr. March 28, 2024.
Added to Locals. March 28, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. March 28, 2024.
Added to X. March 28, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
