It seems that democrats, progressives, liberals, leftists are enthusiastic to demonstrate their ingenious originality. Once a particularly novel comment is made everyone repeats it exactly the same way. Sorta like what happens on newscasts frequently when the person speaking repeats closely or exactly verbatim what was said on another broadcast by another person. Eerie isn't it. Some may get the impression it is consensual plagiarism.
Added to Gab. March 26, 2024.
Added to Gettr. March 26, 2024.
Added to Locals. March 26, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. March 26, 2024.
Added to X. March 26, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
