To prophesize that banning something such as reading material will be effective is like prophesizing that accusing DJT of just about everything, will be effective in accomplishing anything else than making him more popularly known or notoriously known depending on your point of view.
Previously this perspective was summarized in the PT Barnum version "There is no such thing as bad publicity."
Added to Gab. March 24, 2024.
Added to Gettr. March 24, 2024.
Added to Locals. March 24, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. March 24, 2024.
Added to X. March 24, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
