By the process of intellectual examination followed by elimination, it can be established that a plagiarizer who repeatedly plagiarizes is proving they do not remember much if anything they learned or read. Stated differently, if preferred, they are demonstrating therefore proving they never learned anything by not acknowledging they learned/read about the topic and/or the person. How intelligent (smart as us yokels might say it.) is that? If they cannot remember what they have read, how can it be assured (and demonstrated) they will remember anything? For example......? Can't remember what I was thinking.
Added to Gab. February 25, 2024.
Added to Gettr. February 25, 2024.
Added to Locals. February 25, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. February 25, 2024.
Added to X. February 25, 2024.
WEF. World Economic Forum. A group that thinks they are the world, themselves.
Working hard to become the backup for the U.N.
WHO - Future contenders.
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 19, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 19, 2025.
Locals: Aug 19, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 19, 2025.
X: Aug 19, 2025.
History is dependable. A good example of its repetitious nature is the shootout at the OK Corral being a template for the shout out at the Home Depot corral (parking lot/garage).
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 18, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 18, 2025.
Locals: Aug 18, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 18, 2025.
X: Aug 18, 2025.
A rumor is that sometimes the simplest answer is the correct answer.
A reason I think (believe) there is a God? I think.
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 18, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 18, 2025.
Locals: Aug 18, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 18, 2025.
X: Aug 18, 2025.
