Let us prepare ourselves for nouveau (and early) voting.
Headline: Ban Donald Trump Petition Surges Past 500,000 Signatures. (1)
Note # 1: similar results may be obtained on the actual election day.
Note # 2: not specified is whether the 500K signatures were one person who signed 500K times or any combination between that scenario and the other extreme. Or just made up.
Do not forget to vote early and often.
Do it for the children. (aka: politicians)
Hey. Might as well take advantage of nonsense as it occurs. I did build this.
(1) https : // www . msn . com / en-us / news/politics/ban-donald-trump-petition-surges-past-500-000-signatures/ar-BB1hUUg9?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=89b38b891c6e49a1a34e8eea8f03dbfb&ei=21
Note: this is from a Newsweek effort published on the website: msm . com
Added to Gab. February 7, 2024.
Added to Gettr. February 7, 2024.
Added to Locals. February 7, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. February 7, 2024.
Added to X. February 7, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
