For certain this sounds obvious but enjoy till at least my heart and your heart also, if you are so inclined, is/are content. People do not (1) disagree with things they agree with (2). Apply this logic liberally. And ignore the benefit of anyone's doubt.
(1) A person is lying when their non disagreement is because they do not want someone to know they actually agree.
(2) Politicians specifically are well versed in the application of this tactic.
Added to Gab. February 3, 2024.
Added to Gettr. February 3, 2024.
Added to Locals. February 3, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. February 3, 2024.
Added to X. February 3, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
