Help me understand that a person goes to a meeting at which they know they will attempt to cajole another person to eliminate themself (bow-out) from participating in a competitive event. Did it not come to mind before the meeting that even if the person attempting to succeed at persuasion, thought they could successfully convince the other person to agree, what would stop that other person from denying such an agreement was achieved after the meeting? Was there to be a signed written agreement or was the meeting recorded by both parties knowingly or unknowingly? Or maybe it was to be built on the foundation of a back-room hand shake?
Hmm. As Bugs Bunny quires, "What's up doc?" (1)
(1) Bugs Bunny is a cartoon. For those unfamiliar, please look it up.
Added to Gab. January 25, 2024.
Added to Gettr. January 25, 2024.
Added to Locals. January 25, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. January 25, 2024.
Added to X. January 25, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
