Help me understand that a person goes to a meeting at which they know they will attempt to cajole another person to eliminate themself (bow-out) from participating in a competitive event. Did it not come to mind before the meeting that even if the person attempting to succeed at persuasion, thought they could successfully convince the other person to agree, what would stop that other person from denying such an agreement was achieved after the meeting? Was there to be a signed written agreement or was the meeting recorded by both parties knowingly or unknowingly? Or maybe it was to be built on the foundation of a back-room hand shake?
Hmm. As Bugs Bunny quires, "What's up doc?" (1)
(1) Bugs Bunny is a cartoon. For those unfamiliar, please look it up.
Added to Gab. January 25, 2024.
Added to Gettr. January 25, 2024.
Added to Locals. January 25, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. January 25, 2024.
Added to X. January 25, 2024.
Some people who seem to express themselves to be much more knowledgeable and skilled than I, are excellent demonstrators of the practice of perfect planning, after the project is completed.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Feb 2026]
Gab: Feb 26, 2026.
GETTR: Feb 26, 2026.
Locals: Feb 26, 2026.
Truth Social: Feb 26, 2026.
X: Feb 26, 2026.
The decision is the most obvious indicator of intention.
Note: a practical measuring stick for politician's behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Feb 2026]
Gab: Feb 26, 2026.
GETTR: Feb 26, 2026.
Locals: Feb 26, 2026.
Truth Social: Feb 26, 2026.
X: Feb 26, 2026.
I have not had a meeting with (TOS) Terms Of Service. Perhaps someday TOS will send me a message not knowing that the TOS has to meet with my TOU Terms Of Use.
Should TOS be dissatisfied with TOU, we shall be separated forever for a lack of mutually agreed understanding of the concept of freedom.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Feb 2026]
Gab: Feb 25, 2026.
GETTR: Feb 25, 2026.
Locals: Feb 25, 2026.
Truth Social: Feb 25, 2026.
X: Feb 25, 2026.
