This will sound silly, even absurd to some. I'll take a chance and say if an objective is to destroy something, that is destructive not productive. Example "reproductive freedom" is directed to the destruction of human life. So, behind the language mask is the true wording that leads to the correct meaning. Re(al)destructive freedom. That is the goal.
Added to Gab. January 16, 2024.
Added to Gettr. January 16, 2024.
Added to Locals. January 16, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. January 16, 2024.
Added to X. January 16, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
