My moment of insanity? Enjoy!!!
A consensus of insane (self-identifying) people, not one of whom has been physically directly talked to, are 101% sure that those who do not want to be censored by the insane usually just do not want to talk about a topic (more likely they do not want to talk to insane people). This consensus was not ascertained by statistical scientific methodology. This has not been proven. However, if provided with funding by government it can be independently documented as correct whether it is right or wrong. Just like economic activity. Note: the back-up data will be stored in the rings of trees.
Yes, you should be chiding yourself for wasting your own time reading this gibberish. But you never know till it's over.
Smile!
Added to Gab. January 6, 2024.
Added to Gettr. January 6, 2024.
Added to Locals. January 6, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. January 6, 2024.
Added to X. January 6, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
