Individuals will support what they do not disagree with. Or, for those with a straightforward thought process. Individuals support what they like. For someone having difficulty understanding the word "like", it means that an individual does not object to the action or thought under consideration. If the waters are still muddy, seek psychiatric counseling.
For example, consider the thought and subsequent action that constitutes pedophilia.
Added to Gab. January 4, 2024.
Added to Gettr. January 4, 2024.
Added to Locals. January 4, 2024.
Added to Truth Social. January 4, 2024.
Added to X. January 4, 2024.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
