Sometimes when a thought pops into your mind, you just know it has to be journalized.
The headline/comment: (1) "Sexism in academia is bad for science." Oh, the wonders of smartass-ism. (New philosophy?) Science in academia is bad for science. Or even the most accurate, science in science is bad for science. Note: this applies under current societal intellectual/mental conditions. Circumstances may change.
(1) comment taken from Powerline 2023.12.16: https : // www . powerlineblog . com / ed-assets/2023/12/Screenshot-2023-12-11-at-12.01.43%E2%80%AFPM.png
Added to Gab. December 18, 2023.
Added to Gettr. December 18, 2023.
Added to Locals. December 18, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. December 18, 2023.
Added to X. December 18, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
