Generally speaking, instinct is a very strong motivator of the behavior of human beings. One instinct, sex is exempted, which seems to explain why it is behavior that has to be taught and learned. At least as far as the current information that is known. However, someone, somewhere, anytime may "feel" differently about the "teach and learn" aspect. So scientifically it may be different tomorrow or it may be different at this moment. Who knows? This logic emanates from the scientific fantasy contained in the "Book of Feelings". A book that is on sale now behind your back, or in a room you are not aware of, by people who do not want you to know about it.
Added to Gab. December 12, 2023.
Added to Gettr. December 12, 2023.
Added to Locals. December 12, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. December 12, 2023.
Added to X. December 12, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
