A person can make a good guess that someone is insincere if they rant persistently about an issue that is already addressed in other ways. For example, control of (fire)arms. The resolution of the matter that pertains to firearms is so evident but ignored. All that is necessary is for one individual not to assault another individual with or without a weapon. There are many laws that pertain to that issue. The reason to control firearms is to minimize the possibility that they who desire control of others will confront someone who they are trying to control who has a firearm.
The short version is, don't try to control those you know you cannot control. That is the group comprised of occupationally adjacent who are criminals.
Added to Gab. November 24, 2023.
Added to Gettr. November 24, 2023.
Added to Locals. November 24, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. November 24, 2023.
Added to X. November 24, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
