Think along with me as I meander through musings of logic and reason to identify some tidbit of rational reality that makes it seem comprehensible to understand (determine) that one has to know one’s self before venturing into the abys(s)mal depths of another’s thoughts. This comment is directed to those who do not “think about it” in order to understand “it”. May they have and Give Happy Thanks for their sanity that I am attempting to shatter this Thursday the 23rd day of November 2023.
Added to Gab. November 23, 2023.
Added to Gettr. November 23, 2023.
Added to Locals. November 23, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. November 23, 2023.
Added to X. November 23, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
