Many times, a politician’s excuse of non-culpability is “I was not involved.” Grasp the full depth (disdain) of that comment. A person is in politics to be involved; thus, their behavior demonstrates they do not care, and they lied to be there. Or, that person went into politics to not be involved which is antithetical to what they proclaim and still they do not accomplish anything for their constituents or all citizens. Or that person has no skills to do the job they are (supposedly) performing. Which is the best evaluation of two categories of the preceding three options? Deceitful (liar), or incompetent, deceitful (liar).
Added to Gab. September 26, 2023.
Added to Gettr. September 26, 2023.
Added to Locals. September 26, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. September 26, 2023.
Added to X. September 26, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
