During this period when people are openly indicating they cannot distinguish between a male and female it is very likely they cannot distinguish between biased and unbiased.
For example:
If a person claims they will conduct experiments to determine if something does happen, they are biased.
If a person claims they will conduct experiments to determine if something does not happen, they are biased.
If a person claims they will conduct experiments to determine what happens, they are closer than the other two options because the result can go either way. Neither is expected.
Consciously or subconsciously, there is a mental push/pull to identify the aspects that will substantiate the outcome anticipated.
Added to Gab. September 7, 2023.
Added to Gettr. September 7, 2023.
Added to Locals. September 7, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. September 7, 2023.
Added to X. September 7, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
