A personal philosophy I have is to give a person the benefit of the doubt until there is no doubt.
Or, stated differently:
The benefit of the doubt is not perpetual.
Note: Initial date: December 17, 2015. Update: August 17, 2023.
The benefit of the doubt does not apply to what someone else doubts. It applies to what I doubt.
Added to Gab. August 12, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. August 12, 2022.
Added to Gettr. August 17, 2023.
Added to Locals. August 17, 2023.
Added to X. August 17, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
