A certainty, perhaps the only certainty in many cases, that results from cheating is defining the person as a cheater. A person usually cheats when they do not have the self-belief that they are competent to complete the task without cheating. Which makes it more likely they do not know what they are doing. If they were successful cheating, you can bet cheating the second, third and fourth times will materialize.
Added to Gab. August 10, 2023.
Added to Gettr. August 10, 2023.
Added to Locals. August 10, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. August 10, 2023.
Added to X. August 10, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
