The absurdity, foolishness and hypocrisy of liberals is exceeded only by their stupidity. The liberals complain about fellow citizens’ who they claim receive too much money for their hard work.
If you profess that people who earn more money than you earn are evil, immoral or unfair, then why would tax them for their money. It will make you morally equal to or worse than those you claim are evil, immoral or unfair. Not only will you be evil, immoral and unfair to all those who have less than you, but you have also taken some of the money by force from others. You have the moral code of a robber or thief combined with the evil and unfairness you claim others have. Add to that, the envy and jealousy demonstrated by your actions against those who apparently have worked harder or longer, more effectively or more imaginatively than you.
So called social justice is camouflage for envy and jealousy of your fellow Americans.
Persons who complain about their fellow citizens who achieve greater success, even though the successful work hard to earn more compensation, still believe that they are not compensated fairly and equally. But why would they want to be compensated fairly and equally? Particularly, since they will be in the same category as the evil, immoral and unfair successful group. It is a paradox to the logical but entirely rationalized by the liberals. In their case it is Social Justice. The successful who earn more are evil and unfair but those who want to take what the successful have earned are achieving Social Justice. A self-deception to rationalize their evil, immoral contempt for those who can and do produce and achieve. It is rationalization of the two vices envy and jealousy. Underneath it all they behave immaturely, unable to take responsibility for the own well-being.
Added to Gab. August 4, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. August 4, 2022.
Added to Gettr. July 7, 2023.
Added to Locals. July 7, 2023.
Added to Twitter. July 7, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.