There is an ongoing effort to establish a third legal and moral standard. Of course, there is what is right aka a legal standard and there is what is wrong aka a illegal standard. The targeted third standard should be called the “ignored” standard. Ignored is used predominately when an action is improper or illegal that an individual or group do not want to acknowledge because they agree with the action even though it is illegal. If they ignore the activity, they behave as if that makes the activity moot whether wrong or right.
Added to Gab. January 11, 2023.
Added to GETTR. January 11, 2023.
Added to Locals. January 11, 2023.
Added to Truth Social. January 11, 2023.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
