The pro and con of the “living constitution” position are:
Pro, it fits within the circumstances of society today as interpreted by some.
Con, it fits within the circumstances of society tomorrow as interpreted by some.
Just speculating that ultimately the Constitution will be interpreted to mean what was originally intended, or close to it because, if history is not learned, we and our children are doomed or fortunate to repeat it.
What is here today is gone tomorrow, and the next day and so on.
Added to Gab. December 15, 2022.
Added to GETTR. December 15, 2022.
Added to Locals. December 15, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. December 15, 2022.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
