The following statement is not particularly complex logic. However, many people demonstrate a difficulty conceptualizing and applying the reasoning to their own thoughts. A primary reason that people do not want others to speak is because they disagree with what those other people will say. They have no arguable logical reasoning to explain why they disagree. What complicates their argument, and its irrationality is that they are thinking this way before they listen to what is to be said.
Added to Gab. December 8, 2022.
Added to GETTR. December 8, 2022.
Added to Locals. December 8, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. December 8, 2022.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
