A foundation block for liberalism, progressivism, and the democratic party is moral relativism. In and of itself moral relativism is a judgment. The crux of this tenet is that you can't judge others for their actions because they have their own culture that condones or rejects the behavior in question. Based on those tenets, it would seem that there would little or no effort by liberals to control the behavior of others. Alas, that is not the case.
The very definitional conflict inherent in "moral equivalence" may not be realized or acknowledged by those who profess a faith to this cult of liberalism.
Example:
1. If you cannot judge that person 1 or group 1 has committed either a bad act (a judgment) or good act (a judgment) of violence such as shooting rockets randomly into the neighborhoods and cities of group 2 because group 1 professes a grievance against group 2, then there is no judgment to be issued or stated because group 1 has a grievance against group 2. For progressivism the grievance establishes the moral equivalence.
2. Therefore, if there is moral equivalence, then the action or reaction on the part of group 2 that is the result of a grievance against group 1 cannot be judged.
Moral equivalence in its abstract true form would be passivism not advocacy since there is no judgment of good and evil, right and wrong, or left and right. There is only equivalence. Otherwise noting is equal.
Added to Gab. December 5, 2022.
Added to GETTR. December 5, 2022.
Added to Locals. December 5, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. December 5, 2022.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
