Is not the most effective and perhaps the most efficient way to prove something, simply to prove it?
For example:
If a person wins the most votes in an election. After which someone questions the results and asserts the results are wrong. Is not the easiest way to prove it just to count the votes again? The winner can capitalize on the recount by having the votes recounted under their supervision by those who doubted the result. That may embarrass those doubters. It should work like a charm. Unless…..
Added to Gab. November 19, 2022.
Added to GETTR. November 19, 2022.
Added to Locals. November 19, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. November 19, 2022.
WEF. World Economic Forum. A group that thinks they are the world, themselves.
Working hard to become the backup for the U.N.
WHO - Future contenders.
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 19, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 19, 2025.
Locals: Aug 19, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 19, 2025.
X: Aug 19, 2025.
History is dependable. A good example of its repetitious nature is the shootout at the OK Corral being a template for the shout out at the Home Depot corral (parking lot/garage).
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 18, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 18, 2025.
Locals: Aug 18, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 18, 2025.
X: Aug 18, 2025.
A rumor is that sometimes the simplest answer is the correct answer.
A reason I think (believe) there is a God? I think.
/SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [Aug 2025]
Gab: Aug 18, 2025.
GETTR: Aug 18, 2025.
Locals: Aug 18, 2025.
Truth Social: Aug 18, 2025.
X: Aug 18, 2025.
