If you adamantly object to something and want to prevent that something from happening, would you be a bystander?
Contrary to the qualifying statements included in financial advertisements, for politicians the best indicator of future performance is past performance.
By telling constituents that the solution to the repeal of the ACA will be its own implosion is telling them that a politician is not needed because it will happen with or without you. It is especially foolish to do nothing to prove your point. Unfortunately for politicians there are a lot of do-nothings.
A question for all politicians, who do you think is responsible for the condition of our country, our society, our morals, our ethics, our standards, our values? Every one of you is!
Added to Gab. November 2, 2022.
Added to GETTR. November 2, 2022.
Added to Locals. November 2, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. November 2, 2022.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
