Sanity self-test with recommendations! Is it reasonable to place any reliance on comments by people who proclaim or acknowledge claims that a man can be a woman solely by thinking it is so, or a riot is mostly peaceful, or men can have babies, or fetuses are clumps of cells, and so on ad nauseum?
Would you place reliance on any other comments coming from those same intellectual masters of nonsense? If until this moment you have thought favorably of pronouncements from such intellectuals, consider exercising you brain cells more frequently or obtaining counseling or perhaps listening to people who have not made such proclamations.
Added to Gab. July 1, 2022.
Added to Locals. September 1, 2022.
Added to Truth Social. June 3, 2022.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
