Performance of many within the ideology(ies) currently held by the Administration (2022) members is not properly evaluated on the basis of competence. I do not know a definitive or objective method to measure their ideology. Thus, their competence at conducting themselves in the operation and implementation of the ideology. From a Free Market point of view, a more accurate evaluation may be the apparent irrelevance of anyone other than those who act and believe as they do. It is a cult ideology. Thus, the more people made irrelevant the more destructive vs. successful are the results. One historical response to the inoperability of their ideology is paraphrased in the comment that it (leftism) hasn’t been done correctly, yet. Of course, if you do the same thing over and over expecting different results, are you schizophrenic?
Added to Gab. July 1, 2022.
Added to Locals. September 1, 2022.
Added to TruthSocial. May 23, 2022.
To turn my leering leaching eye to the realm of "Notes", for example "Community Notes" and all other sources of information sometimes also called data either for or not for "checking" or any other purpose such as research. Can there be identified anything that is useless before one's encounter with such note (source)?
Requisite condition: How would one know for themself?
Do I hear it now? What you say?
Self-assigned complication rating: <1>). Or maybe zero.
Point: Everything old is always new to some or many.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
What I am quite but not completely sure of is that I would support not preventing anyone from not doing what they do not want to do. However, in some situations I would not recommend such behavior.
SG - Free Thought - [Locals] - [June 2026]
Gab: June 2, 2026.
GETTR: June 2, 2026.
Locals: June 2, 2026.
Truth Social: June 2, 2026.
X: June 2, 2026.
